Elon Musk Launches Grokipedia to Challenge Wikipedia

Elon Musk’s latest move in the AI-arms race is nothing short of audacious as his company xAI has launched Grokipedia, an AI-powered online encyclopedia that Musk bills as a “massive improvement over Wikimedia Foundation’s Wikipedia” and a necessary step toward his goal of “understanding the Universe”.

Grokipedia went live on October 27, 2025 in “version 0.1” form, and it already lists nearly 900,000 entries, a respectable count for a launch, though still far behind Wikipedia’s millions of articles in English alone. The interface is simple and dark-themed, reminiscent of Wikipedia but powered entirely by xAI’s “Grok” large language model.

Musk has long criticized Wikipedia, accusing it of liberal bias (he has even dubbed it “Wokipedia”), and Grokipedia is his answer a platform he says will be more “truth-seeking”, less filtered, and oriented around his vision of what knowledge should be.

Yet the story is already complicated. Within hours of launch, Grokipedia experienced technical issues (the site briefly crashed) and content analysts flagged entries that propagate far-right talking points, historical inaccuracies, and biased framing of topics such as gender identity and slavery.

For example, one entry was found to claim that pornography significantly exacerbated the AIDS epidemic and that social media is causing a rise in transgender identities claims that run counter to mainstream academic consensus. Another page on slavery included a section about “ideological justifications” of slavery and elevated criticism of The 1619 Project. 

Still, Grokipedia is notable not only for the controversy it brings, but for what it shows, a shift in how online knowledge and AI intersect. By building a rival to Wikipedia, Musk is attempting to reshape the infrastructure of public information and perhaps even influence how future AI systems are trained on “what is known”.

The entry of a major tech figure into the world of encyclopedias raises big questions. What happens when an encyclopedia is generated and curated by a private AI company instead of a global volunteer community? How will bias, editorial oversight, citations, and trust be managed in a system where the creator has ideological motivations? And what does this mean for knowledge ecosystems that feed machine-learning models across the web?

For developers, publishers, technologists and educators, Grokipedia is a wake-up call in that the “open knowledge” stack may no longer be just Wikipedia + open source it might soon include AI-first platforms backed by major tech players. If this is true, then questions of data quality, governance, transparency and neutrality become even more central.

And for the everyday user, the platform introduces both potential and caution. On the one hand, Grokipedia promises a new kind of searchable, AI-powered reference — possibly more dynamic and up to date than traditional encyclopedias. On the other hand, the early signs show that “AI + knowledge” isn’t guaranteed to deliver more accurate or less biased information it may just deliver a different set of biases.

In short, Grokipedia isn’t just a new website; it’s a statement about power, knowledge, and AI in our time. Whether it becomes a credible alternative to Wikipedia or remains a niche experiment remains to be seen. But what matters now is that the traditional model of “crowd-sourced volunteer knowledge” is facing a serious challenger, one backed by one of the most influential tech entrepreneurs of our age.