The European Commission confirmed on Friday that TikTok and Meta, the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, have violated the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) transparency requirements.
According to the commission, TikTok and Meta were found to have violated the Union’s regulations pertaining to unlawful or harmful online content after an examination by EU regulators.
Both corporations are not meeting the requirements of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which mandates that they provide researchers with sufficient access to public data, according to preliminary findings released by the European Commission (EC) on Friday.
The European Union’s executive agency said in a statement that its initial investigation reveals the social media behemoths were “in breach of their obligation to grant researchers adequate access to public data under the DSA.”
According to the European Commission, Meta was also failing to fulfil its responsibilities to give users “simple mechanisms” to alert the platforms to unlawful content and to enable them to “effectively challenge content moderation discussions.”
The Commission described the processes and resources used by Meta and TikTok to request access to public data as “burdensome,” stating that researchers are frequently left with incomplete or faulty data as a result, which has an impact on “their ability to conduct research, such as whether users, including minors, are exposed to illegal or harmful content.”
The DSA is an attempt by the EU to rid major online platforms of hate speech, fake news, and disinformation as part of the bloc’s effort to safeguard users’ rights and make the internet a better place.
As “it provides public scrutiny into the potential impact of platforms on our physical and mental health,” the Commission stated that granting researchers access to the data of the online platforms is a crucial transparency obligations and requirement under the DSA.
“Trust is essential to our democracy. The Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy, Henna Virkkunen, stated that platforms must empower users, uphold their rights, and allow for examination of their systems.
Virkkunen further stated that the team is making sure platforms are accountable for their services, as ensured by EU law, towards users and society.”
The next steps, according to the commission, after reviewing and responding to the Commission’s first conclusions, the three social media companies will have the chance to “remedy the breaches.”
The EU might impose sanctions of up to 6% of the platform’s total yearly global revenue if the preliminary results are validated.
The Commission warned that in order to force the platforms to comply, penalty payments can potentially be made.
The Commission also said that Meta’s Facebook and Instagram accounts violated its duties to give EU citizens easy means to report unlawful information. The Commission accused Facebook and Instagram of employing “dark patterns,” or design cues that encourage users to take specific activities, and claimed that both sites require a number of pointless steps before users may report content.
A representative for Meta claimed the business “disagrees with any suggestion” that it violated the DSA in a statement provided to a media firm.
Meta continues by stating that in the European Union, we have introduced changes to our content reporting options, appeals process, and data access tools since the DSA came into force and are confident that these solutions match what is required under the law in the EU, Meta continued.
Such actions may be a surprise and a discouraging one and thus, it’s possible that Meta’s systems for identifying and eliminating unlawful content are ineffectual,” the Commission noted via statement.
The EC further said that EU citizens are not permitted to fully explain or substantiate their complaints through the moderation appeal processes of either Meta platform which limits the effectiveness of the appeals mechanism by making it difficult for users in the EU to further explain why they disagree with Meta’s content decision.”
On the other hand, TikTok claims to have made “significant investments” in data sharing and to have provided around 1,000 research teams with access to data through its research tools. “We are reviewing the European Commission’s findings, but requirements to ease data safeguards place the DSA and GDPR in direct tension.
A TikTok representative said in an emailed statement, “We urge regulators to provide clarity on how these obligations should be reconciled if it is not possible to fully comply with both.”
And in the meantime, Meta asserted that it had modified its procedures and instruments to meet DSA standards. We continue to discuss these issues with the European Commission, and we reject any claim that we have violated the DSA. Since the DSA went into effect, the European Union has made adjustments to its content reporting procedures, appeals procedure, and data access capabilities. We are certain that these solutions align with EU legal requirements,” a Meta representative stated.
Penalties for verified DSA violations might amount to as much as 6% of yearly worldwide income.
Both Meta and TikTok will have the opportunity to examine the investigation’s papers, contest the conclusions, and pledge to take corrective action, according to the EC.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
