Meta Revenue Beats But AI Spending And Legal Costs Hit Profit

Meta has delivered the kind of earnings report that explains why investors are both impressed by its advertising machine and nervous about how expensive the next phase of the company may become.

The Facebook and Instagram parent said in its second-quarter results that revenue rose 28 percent year over year to $60.8 billion for the quarter ended June 30. That was ahead of Wall Street expectations, helped by strong advertising demand across Meta’s family of apps. But net income fell 14 percent to $15.85 billion, while diluted earnings per share dropped 13 percent to $6.18.

That split is the story. Meta is still very good at selling ads, and the company said ad impressions across its family of apps increased 14 percent while the average price per ad rose 12 percent. Family daily active people reached 3.60 billion in June, up 3 percent from a year earlier. Those numbers show that Meta’s core business remains a massive cash engine even after years of regulatory pressure, privacy changes and competition from TikTok, YouTube Shorts and messaging apps.

The pressure came from costs. Total costs and expenses rose 55 percent to $42.03 billion. Meta said that included $2.4 billion in charges tied to legal proceedings and $1.18 billion in severance expenses connected to a May 2026 headcount reduction. Operating margin fell to 31 percent from 43 percent a year earlier, which explains why a revenue beat was not enough to keep investors comfortable.

AI spending remains the bigger long-term concern. Meta said capital expenditures, including principal payments on finance leases, were $31.08 billion in the quarter. The company also narrowed its full-year 2026 capital expenditure outlook to $130 billion to $145 billion, up at the lower end from its previous $125 billion to $145 billion range. In plain terms, Meta is not backing away from the AI buildout.

Mark Zuckerberg framed the spending as necessary because AI is already improving the core business and opening new product and enterprise opportunities. That is the argument Meta has to keep making. Unlike Microsoft, which can point directly to Azure growth, Meta’s AI return is more blended into ad targeting, recommendation systems, creator tools, business messaging and future bets like smart glasses and enterprise AI services.

That is why this result lands differently from Microsoft’s own strong cloud quarter. Microsoft can say Azure demand is rising and show a direct cloud line. Meta has to convince investors that better ads, higher engagement and new AI products will justify the scale of the infrastructure bill. The company’s newer social and assistant features, including the move to bring Meta AI deeper into Threads messages, fit into that wider attempt to make AI a daily layer across its apps.

Meta’s guidance gives the company some room. It expects third-quarter revenue of $61 billion to $64 billion, while full-year expenses are now expected to land between $165 billion and $169 billion. Free cash flow, however, was only $784 million in the quarter, a sharp reminder that infrastructure spending can swallow a lot of operating cash even when the ad business is growing.

There is also a strategic question around trust. Meta is trying to make AI more useful inside Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads, while also fighting scams, impersonation and synthetic content problems on those same platforms. Its recent decision to make Facebook Verified free was part of that wider pressure to prove real accounts and safer interactions still matter as AI content becomes harder to identify.

So Meta’s Q2 report is not weak in the simple sense. Revenue beat, users grew, ad pricing improved and the company still produced billions in profit. The concern is that the cost of building Meta’s AI future is rising faster than investors can clearly measure the payoff. Until that changes, every strong ad quarter may still come with the same question. How long before the AI bill starts looking like a business line rather than a promise?